
Fill the gap – gaps as a starting point for change
Transformation instead of change: the path to a social-ecological future
Job crafting and algorithms: opportunities and challenges for the world of work



Transforming economic models: shrink or grow?
Conclusions: transformation as a shared process
Next steps: what can we actually do?
- Strengthen participation: We should focus on establishing genuinely participatory processes that include all parts of society. Token participation undermines trust in change processes.
- Understand transformation as a process: Transformation must not be seen as a static measure. It is an ongoing process that all stakeholders must actively help shape.
- Promote new economic models: It is time to think beyond conventional growth logic and establish economic models that put sustainability and the common good at their core.
- Use technology wisely: Algorithms and data analysis must always be used with the goal of promoting mental health and job satisfaction without increasing workloads.
- Broaden perspectives: Different viewpoints and cross-generational approaches must be encouraged more strongly in order to develop innovative solutions to complex challenges.
Conclusion: finding the courage to transform
For everyone interested who couldn’t attend LABOR.A this year:
We can look forward to this year’s recordings in the LABOR.A media library. Recorded talks from previous years are already available at the following link.

What do design and democracy have to do with each other?
Frankfurt, the current World Design Capital, also underlines the importance of design for societal transformation. Through innovative design, cities like Frankfurt can foster cohesion and make democratic processes more inclusive. For me, this shows that design is a key tool for strengthening both participation and public dialogue. You can find more information at the following links:
The positive impact of design: innovation and dialogue
The downside: quick fixes and the risk of superficiality



Design is a bridge between disciplines, far more than a purely aesthetic tool.
This bridging function can also be seen very concretely in the Gay Bomb. How do you transform a military weapon and create a symbol for social change?
Future rhythms
Conclusion
The Holitopia Festival made clear that art and design can have both positive and negative effects on the future. The festival is a potpourri of the understood and the not-understood. It sees itself as an invitation to pause and think. A facilitator for futures, as Madeleine Schwinge also describes it. Let’s stay curious, resonate with one another, simply get started and, through doing, develop an attitude that in turn sets others in motion. The last thing we need in times of AI-ification is to standardize our thoughts. Then we lose our aura and our transformative power as individuals. We need a creative intelligence that drives us.
You can learn more about the Holitopia Festival in the interview with Madeleine Schwinge on Deutschlandfunk Kultur [in German]:

